Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Clinical Endoscopy ; : 211-221, 2021.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-890060

ABSTRACT

Background/Aims@#This study aimed to determine the performance of the AIMS65 score (AIMS65), Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS), and Rockall score (RS) in predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB), and to compare the results between patients with nonvariceal UGIB (NVUGIB) and those with variceal UGIB (VUGIB). @*Methods@#We conducted a prospective observational study between March 2016 and December 2017. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed for all outcomes for comparison. The associations of all three scores with mortality were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis. @*Results@#Of the total of 337 patients with UGIB, 267 patients (79.2%) had NVUGIB. AIMS65 was significantly associated (odds ratio [OR]=1.735; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.148–2.620), RS was marginally associated (OR=1.225; 95% CI=0.973–1.543), but GBS was not associated (OR=1.017; 95% CI=0.890–1.163) with mortality risk in patients with UGIB. However, all three scores accurately predicted all other outcomes (all p0.05). Only AIMS65 precisely predicted mortality, the need for blood transfusion and the composite endpoint (all p<0.05) in patients with VUGIB. @*Conclusions@#AIMS65 is superior to GBS and RS in predicting mortality in patients with UGIB, and also precisely predicts the need for blood transfusion and the composite endpoint in patients with VUGIB. No scoring system could satisfactorily predict rebleeding in all patients with UGIB.

2.
Clinical Endoscopy ; : 211-221, 2021.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-897764

ABSTRACT

Background/Aims@#This study aimed to determine the performance of the AIMS65 score (AIMS65), Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS), and Rockall score (RS) in predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB), and to compare the results between patients with nonvariceal UGIB (NVUGIB) and those with variceal UGIB (VUGIB). @*Methods@#We conducted a prospective observational study between March 2016 and December 2017. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed for all outcomes for comparison. The associations of all three scores with mortality were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis. @*Results@#Of the total of 337 patients with UGIB, 267 patients (79.2%) had NVUGIB. AIMS65 was significantly associated (odds ratio [OR]=1.735; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.148–2.620), RS was marginally associated (OR=1.225; 95% CI=0.973–1.543), but GBS was not associated (OR=1.017; 95% CI=0.890–1.163) with mortality risk in patients with UGIB. However, all three scores accurately predicted all other outcomes (all p0.05). Only AIMS65 precisely predicted mortality, the need for blood transfusion and the composite endpoint (all p<0.05) in patients with VUGIB. @*Conclusions@#AIMS65 is superior to GBS and RS in predicting mortality in patients with UGIB, and also precisely predicts the need for blood transfusion and the composite endpoint in patients with VUGIB. No scoring system could satisfactorily predict rebleeding in all patients with UGIB.

3.
Clinical Endoscopy ; : 582-585, 2013.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-125247

ABSTRACT

A 49-year-old woman presented with chronic abdominal discomfort, significant weight loss, and chronic intermittent diarrhea. She suddenly developed massive upper gastrointestinal bleeding and was referred for further treatment. Endoscopy indicated a large mass in the upper gastric body with antral and duodenal bulb involvement. Endosonography showed a large well-defined isoechoic gastric subepithelial mass with multiple intra-abdominal and peripancreatic lymphadenopathy, suspected to be malignant on the basis of fine needle aspiration cytology. The tumor was surgically removed, and histopathology showed typical characteristics of a neuroendocrine tumor. On the basis of immunohistochemical staining, somatostatinoma, a rare neuroendocrine tumor, was diagnosed. Gastrointestinal bleeding is a rare presentation and the stomach is an uncommon tumor location.


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Biopsy, Fine-Needle , Carbamates , Diarrhea , Endoscopy , Endosonography , Hemorrhage , Lymphatic Diseases , Neuroendocrine Tumors , Organometallic Compounds , Somatostatinoma , Stomach , Weight Loss
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL